This article demystifies three pricing regimes as airlines modernize toward Offer & Order (IATA NDC + ONE Order) while integrating ATPCO fare filing infrastructure and emerging continuous pricing capabilities.
Plain Definitions (Simplified)
Legacy Filed Fare Ladder: Discrete price points (e.g. Y, B, M, H, Q, K, L, T) each with a published base fare, rules, and booking code (RBD). Systems choose the lowest open booking class whose rules fit.
Dynamic Pricing (Discrete Adjustments): Injecting controlled adjustments (discounts / mark-ups / virtual classes) around existing filed fares. Still anchored to the nearest filed base; produces a “denser” but finite ladder.
Continuous Pricing: Generating (or selecting) any price within an allowed continuum inside revenue guardrails, not limited to the original ladder steps. Return of price is contextual (channel, customer attributes, demand state) and tokenized as an Offer.
RBD-less (Attribute-Based) Retailing: Seat and product availability expressed through attributes & capacity tokens rather than the single-letter booking class driving price.
Core Shift: From selling pre-published “buckets” to calculating / composing contextual offers while preserving auditability for accounting, settlement, tax, and interline.
2. Legacy vs Dynamic vs Continuous: Comparison Table
Dimension
Legacy Filed Ladder
Dynamic (Discrete)
Continuous
Price Points
Dozens per O&D/date
Hundreds (filed + virtual/adjusted)
Theoretically many (bounded continuum)
Anchor
Filed base fare in ATPCO
Filed fare + rule-based adjustment
Model output (bid price / willingness curve)
Mechanism
Class availability + pricing engine
Dynamic class creation or discount codes
Offer generation service with guardrails
Control Levers
RBD protection levels
RBD + adjustment rules
Bid price / elasticity / product feature bundling
Interline Friendliness
High (common constructs)
Moderate (needs mapping)
Low–Moderate (requires token translation)
Channel Consistency Risk
Low
Medium
Higher (needs strict governance)
Revenue Optimization Potential
Baseline
Incremental uplift
Highest (granularity + personalization)
Complexity & Cost
Legacy sunk cost
Moderate
High (tech + process + governance)
Audit & Settlement Ease
Established
Needs augmentation
Requires Offer → Accounting mapping layer
3. Why Move Beyond Filed Ladders
Reduce distance between optimal bid price and nearest filed fare (less revenue left “between rungs”).
Support personalized ancillaries (seat, bag, lounge) in one price expression.
Compete with LCC algorithmic repricing and OTA merchandising experimentation.
Prepare for attribute-based distribution (Offer & Order) where RBD is not the primary retail concept.
4. ATPCO Context & Constructs (Publicly Known Functions)
ATPCO provides the industry infrastructure for fare filing (base fares, rules categories, footnotes, routing, surcharges, taxes, branded fares, optional services, rich content). Dynamic and continuous pricing must respect or translate:
Base Fares & Rule Categories: Still define legal combinability, advance purchase, change/refund penalties.
Branded Fares (Product Catalog): Offer structure (Brand Y, Brand Flex, etc.). Dynamic pricing may adjust within brand value boundaries.
Optional Services / SSR/EMD Mapping: For ancillaries, continuous pricing can incorporate or discount bundles; still needs correct EMD and tax application.
Data Distribution (Fares, RBD Mappings): Downstream pricing engines ingest ATPCO feeds; continuous layer must track versions to retain audit trails.
Governance: Even in continuous pricing, compliance (e.g., display parity rules, tax calculation) relies on consistent reference to filed constructs.
Validation Step: Engage ATPCO solution / product experts to confirm permissible adjustment ranges and ensure no misuse of constructs (placeholder: “Confirm with ATPCO”).
Fallback Path: If commit validation fails (stale model), system reverts to nearest permitted discrete price or re-quotes with user transparency.
Channel Segmentation: Start continuous pricing only on direct + NDC partners able to consume tokens; keep EDIFACT/GDS on improved discrete ladder.
Monitoring: Divergence windows between model recommended and realized sale tracked as lost optimization metric.
10. Path to an RBD‑less / Attribute World
Attribute Catalog Build: Define features (refundability, change flexibility, seat pitch, bag allowance, priority services).
Mapping Layer: RBD → AttributeSetId for legacy compatibility. Persist version.
Offer Construction API: Accept requested attributes; compute price independent of discrete class letter.
Capacity Tokens: Replace RBD open/close with attribute capacity pool (e.g., Flex Seats remaining).
Progressive De-emphasis: Hide RBD from consumer UX; maintain internally until interline fully supports attribute semantics.
Decommission RBD for Direct: Once auditing & settlement operate on attributes + Order Items reliably, remove RBD gating for direct channels first.
11. Revenue Accounting & Settlement Evolution
Today: Ticket coupons + EMDs feed revenue accounting and proration (interline). Challenge: Continuous prices may not map 1:1 to pre-filed base+adjust taxes if expressed as net + markup.
Interim Approach
Generate a Virtual Fare Basis referencing anchor filed fare + adjustment code.
Store Price Decomposition: base anchor, adjustment amount, ancillary components, tax tables version.
Issue standard e-ticket / EMD with auxiliary fields referencing OfferId for traceability.
Order-Native (Target)
Order Item lines itemize each priced component (seat bundle, ancillary, dynamic adjustment).
Revenue recognition uses Order ledger (no coupon) with standardized attribute taxonomy.
Settlement (BSP/ARC) still requires bridging: produce a clearing record mapping Order Items → pseudo coupon until industry clearing house accepts pure orders.
Accounting Controls: Reconstruct “what would filed fare have been” for auditing tax and surcharge compliance. Differences logged for audit team.
12. Interline & Alliance Implications
Problem: Partner still expects RBD + filed fare. Your continuous price must interoperate.
Near Term: Use anchor filed fare for prorate, allocate adjustment proportionally across sectors (distance or revenue share weighting).
Token Passing: Include OfferContextToken in interline request; if partner cannot consume it, revert to discrete anchor.
Proration: Maintain legacy proration engine; feed it synthetic coupon values consistent with sum of sector splits.
Future: Order-based interline settlement service (industry initiative) accepts full component price lines; no need to compress into RBD-based fare basis codes.
Mitigation: Flag risk of value leakage if partner forces rounding up/down to ladder steps—monitor proration variance vs intended continuous distribution.
13. Example System Capability Categories (Illustrative)
(Vendor names are examples of publicly known categories; validate fit & roadmap directly with providers.)
Disclaimer: Capability names are generic; confirm current feature support (continuous interpolation, tokenization, attribute mapping) with each vendor—roadmaps evolve.
Vendor whitepapers (PROS, Accelya, Amadeus, Sabre) describing dynamic pricing approaches (verify current state directly).
Industry articles on attribute-based retailing and RBD de-emphasis.
Disclaimer: This article synthesizes publicly known concepts and general engineering patterns. It does not include proprietary algorithms, confidential ATPCO data, or vendor-specific implementation secrets. “Dynamic” and “Continuous” definitions vary; confirm alignment with ATPCO and internal legal/compliance before execution. Placeholder steps marked “confirm with ATPCO” require direct validation.
Trademarks belong to their respective owners. No endorsement implied.